jyi # 61A Women Rule The World

Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2012 8:29 PM
Subject: jyi # 61A Women Rule The World
jewsyonkersislamiii-tc.blogspot.com # 61A Women Rule The World

jyi # 61A Women Rule The World

The feminine (x), through the collective feminine (all the x-es in women [xx] and men [xy]), rules the world. But the feminine, woman, does so through men. When men are not being men, but -like today- ever-lazier, irresponsible, effeminate and emasculated, you can bet that the collective feminine is at work. Both reacting against such and causing it to worsen -by making women try to become men and making more men and women "become" gays, lesbians, bisexuals, transgenders and worse- for its own purposes.. The GLAAD... group (along with ALL men and women, to a greater or lesser degree) can well be termed -in today's politically correct terms- sexual-identity challenged.
Below is a continuation of a sub-series on my blog (jewsyonkersislamiii-tc. blogspot.com)
subtitled : US debt
Further below are comments on today's news and some articles, AS I HAVE EDITED THEM , including some excerpts from my journal, my blog or my musings of more than a few years ago. And a critique of today's news.
Why GOP candidates are talking about space ; Woman has sex with clients ; Get the hell out of America, Liberals ;European Union doomed? ; A look at US debt and why the US is doomed if we continue to do as we are doing ; Global threats as noted by US spy chiefs ; Real facts prove the US economy gets ever worse
1-31-12
ALL "NEWS" IS BASED ON THE PAST, BOTH WHAT ACTUALLY SEEMED TO HAPPEN -AS SEEN AND REPORTED BY OBSERVERS/PEOPLE- AND ON HOW WE THINK. FOR HOW WE THINK IS BASED ON HOW WE ARE TAUGHT/LEARN TO THINK. BUT THE PAST IS NO MORE TODAY. EVERYTHING IS CHANGING IN NEW AND DIFFERENT WAYS TODAY, WAYS THAT NEVER BEFORE OCCURRED THROUGHOUT HISTORY. IN ALL COUNTRIES, THE ECONOMY AND SOCIAL STABILITY ARE INTIMATELY LINKED'
Journal News (JN), 10A, New York Times (NYT), A10 China, the "world leader" ? Ridiculous. As I've repeatedly noted, such neither is nor could be so. Among many other reasons for China's near-term collapse, we have the civil wars in Tibet and Xinjiang.
JN, 12A, 14A, NYT, B1, A4, A11 US Home sales drop but "Realtors have a positive outlook on it". In truth, they -like "optimistic" leaders everywhere- are morons, stuck in a dysfunctional past that never worked anyhow.. A "European debt treaty" was signed yesterday but it wont help a thing. The sovereign debt crisis worsens daily and growth is less snd less daily. "Incomes" rose in December (because of holiday hiring) but spending did not. A "Trade collision" between the US and China is in the works because China cheats so much it is unfair. "Belgian workers go on (national) strike" to protest "austerity" measures.
JN, 6A, NYT, A23 "Gillibrand : Congress must put economy first". In truth, those feminist-faggot morons have no idea what to do. Moreover, they have no money with which to do it. (see a discussion of and on the debt at the bottom of this posting). As to the "Great Divorce", facts are facts. Whites are split between the top 20 % and the bottom 30 %. The top has 7 % out-of-wedlock births, the bottom 45 %. The top white men are all working and traditional, the bottom are slowly dropping out of the work force, they are less likely to get married, less likely to go to church, less active in their communities, more likely to watch TV incessently,
more likely to be obese...These facts prove that the ideologies of the feminist-faggot Democrats and the brain-dead Republicans
are equally useless.

MY JOURNAL/BOOK REVIEW "A Different Universe"
"Emergent Principles of Organization" are an undeniable reality. "Collective self-organization" is different from the cause and effect world we live by.. One must always be aware that there is a difference between ":the truth" and what is meant by "truth". An organization can acquire meaning and a life of its own and transcend the parts from it was made, resulting in a new entity. Our limited human consciousness minds always hinder and hold us back from 'eternal' present wholeness/non-conscious awareness (even so, they are all we have) because we are mortal, thus limited. The Frontier is part of American identity. But we no longer have any frontiers anywhere on the planet earth. Serendipity (a fortunate accident) is behind all great discoveries. Sociobiology and evolutionary psychology are fantastic fields of study. All science, religion, psychology...are no more than particular forms of language. Humans reason by means of analogy, not logic. Organization causes law, not the reverse. PSI, OBEs, NDEs..are things that should, logically, not be, but are matters of fact. In politics, things are not real until they are widely discussed, so the news media is crucial. Women use things (computers...) intuitively while men try to figure out how they work. Men create and women complete created things. Vested interests always oppose change (think of the oil, gas, coal...companies - all of which must be shut down). Too many words and too much logic leads to an ever-growing proliferation of logical inconsistencies. Reductionist beliefs (physics... is reductive) are seductive but limited and limiting. Opportunistic social chaos occurs during all transitions. Moving forward requires the invention of entire thought processes. Collective instability is emergent.. Survival, contentment, motion and polygamy are my four essential things. Laws are all about predictive power. But they break down over time.




ATHENS (Reuters) - Greece must make "difficult" decisions in the coming days to clinch a debt swap agreement and a 130 billion euro bailout package needed to avoid an unruly default, the government said on Tuesday. (CIVIL WAR IS IN THE WORKS IF IT DOES)
Near-bankrupt Greece is struggling to convince skeptical lenders it can ram through spending cuts and labor reform to help bridge a funding shortfall driven by a worsening economic climate and its previous reform plan having veered off track. (IN TRUTH, ALL EU8ROPEAN LEADERS ARE LOONEY-BIRDS. NOTHING WILL WORK EVEN IF GREECS "PLEDGES" TO MAKE CUTS)



NEW YORK (Reuters) - Home prices fell more steeply than expected in November, and consumers turned less optimistic in January, highlighting the hurdles still facing the bumpy economic recovery.
After accelerating at its fastest pace in 1-1/2 years at the end of 2011, the U.S. economy is expected to slow in early 2012.
(BUT OUR LEADERS ARE STILL, FOOLISHLY, "OPTIMISTIC" ABOUT HOW WE ARE "ON THE ROAD TO RECOVERY" ; THEY ARE TOTAL MORONS)


Here four key take-aways from the testimony.
1. Core al-Qaida is on the run, but the decentralized jihadi movement still poses a threat
...............
... franchises in weak and failed states such as Yemen, Somalia, and north Africa are still dangerous and plotting attacks against the United States. The global jihadi movement "will continue to be a dangerous transnational force," Clapper wrote. "Terrorist groups and individuals sympathetic to the jihadist movement will have access to the recruits, financing, arms and explosives, and safe havens needed to execute operations."
2. Iran undecided on assembling nuclear weapons; but willing to carry out attacks on the United States
..........................
3. Cyber attacks are a growing threat
Clapper noted growing intelligence community concern about the United States' vulnerability to cyber-threats, from both state-sponsored and non-state hackers from places like China and Russia. Senators at the hearing expressed frustration that the U.S. government still lacks an integrated strategy for confronting the problem. "Cyber threats pose a critical national and economic security concern due to the continued advances in—and growing dependency on—the information technology (IT) that underpins nearly all aspects of modern society," Clapper wrote......................... "cyber intruders continue to explore new means to circumvent defensive measures."
4. Fiscal constraints could hamper the intelligence community
The intelligence community is struggling to assess a world of fast-paced, inter-connected challenges--in a time of fiscal constraints.
"Although I believe that counterterrorism, counterproliferation, cybersecurity, and counterintelligence are at the immediate forefront of our security concerns, it is virtually impossible to rank—in terms of long-term importance—the numerous, potential threats to US national security," Clapper wrote. "The United States no longer faces—as in the Cold War—one dominant threat. Rather, it is the multiplicity and interconnectedness of potential threats—and the actors behind them—that constitute our biggest challenge."
"Indeed, even the four categories noted above are also inextricably linked, reflecting a quickly changing international environment of rising new powers, rapid diffusion of power to nonstate actors and ever greater access by individuals and small groups to lethal technologies," Clapper said. (OUR MAIN PROBLEM IS A LACK OF ADEQUATE COMMON GOALS FOR THE WHOLE HUMAN RACE AND A WORLD GOVERNMENT WITH THE MEANS TO WORK TO SOLVE OUR PROBLEMS AND ATTAIN THESE GOALS - AND THE MEANS TO STAMP OUT ANY OBSTACLES TO PROGRESS. THE MAIN GOAL IS THE SURVIVAL OF THE HUMAN RACE AND ALL ELSE MUST COME SECOND. BECAUSE IF WE'RE ALL DEAD, WHAT ELSE COULD MATTER TO US PRESENTLY LIVING HUMAN BEINGS)

Is the European Union doomed?
By DOUGLAS GOLDSTEIN 01/30/2012 21:51
Greece is leading the charge toward collapse, and Italy, Slovenia, Slovakia, Estonia are also struggling.
By REUTERS/Francois Lenoir..............................

A serious question shadows Europe: will the European Union fail?
......................................


First, what is the main reason for believing that the European Union will dissolve within the next few years? (NEXT FEW WEEKS)
.................... doomed to failure from the beginning because of the historical bad feelings and difficult relationships between the countries of Europe over the past 2,000 years.


A second factor as to why the EU might collapse deals with its newest members........... new to democracy and capitalism may not be ready for free elections, free markets and free trade.

These intra-European conflicts and challenges form the basis of one opinion about the European Union: European nations simply cannot get along well enough to form a union, even an imperfect one.
(NOT WITHOUT ADEQUATE COMMON GOALS)
On the other side of the coin is the belief that despite current turmoil, the EU will not fail.

In part, this belief is based on the “too big to fail” concept applied to American banks (UTTER RUBBISH). According to this argument, ..............

But why, in the minds of these thinkers, will Germany step up to save the EU and the Euro? In some ways it is a matter of “too big to fail,” but the primary reason is the euro itself.

The general consensus is that the individual European countries want to hold onto the Euro. Returning to individual national currencies would devalue all of those currencies. Some countries, such as Greece and Portugal, would see a complete collapse of their financial systems, far worse than the difficulties they currently face.
.............................

What’s more, a breakup of the euro and a return to national currencies might rip the global economy apart. Stock markets around the world would crater, a global banking crisis would ensue, and the United States and Europe would plunge into recession. And that, according to the opinion of a large number of people, is why the euro will survive. It must survive, therefore it will.(NOT SO)

Which of these opinions is correct remains to be seen, but both deserve careful consideration.

Get the hell out of America, Liberals
Speaking to a Lincoln Day Dinner in West Palm Beach for the Palm Beach County GOP, Rep. Allen West (R-Fla) fired off a humdinger of a line that within minutes drew recriminations from Democrats on Twitter.
"We need to let President Obama, Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, (audience boos) and my dear friend the chairman of the Democrat National Committee, we need to let them know that Florida ain't on the table," West said. "Take your message of equality of achievement, take your message of economic dependency, take your message of enslaving the entrepreneurial will and spirit of the American people somewhere else. You can take it to Europe, you can take it to the bottom of the sea, you can take it to the North Pole, but get the hell out of the United States of America."(I TOTALLY AGREE WITH HIM)
Woman has sex with clients for therapy
By Dan Schenek
updated 3:39 PM EST, Fri January 27, 2012
NEED TO KNOW

Cheryl Cohen Green says job is to help people who are confused about sexuality
Greene also helps clients with severe disabilities

A new movie based on the life of sex surrogate Cheryl Cohen Greene premiered at the Sundance Film Festival this week and received rave reviews.

Greene has intercourse with clients for therapy. She explained to Dr. Drew Thursday night exactly what her profession entails.

“My job is to help people who are confused and have a lot of misinformation about sexuality,” she said. “We don't live in a very sex-positive culture. [I] help them understand themselves -- not try to have them fit into what they see in the media … [I] help them to understand how to relax -- how to know more about their own bodies -- how to share that with a partner.”

Dr. Drew then asked Greene about her work with people who have severe disabilities or medical problems that may have no other way to engage in sex.

"Those people have just as much of a sex drive and interest in finding out what they can or cannot do," she responded.

Dr. Drew added, “So [it’s] not about changing a culture or changing people's thinking about sexuality.”

"That's true," Green replied.

Later, a clinical psychologist got into a heated debate with Greene, strongly questioning her work. You can watch that portion of the interview here.

Watch Dr. Drew weeknights at 9 p.m. ET/6 p.m. PT on HLN and follow the show on Twitter @DrDrewHLN.
Why GOP candidates are talking about space
CNN's John Zarrella shares his insights into what's going on with politics and the space program:
Newt Gingrich got a lot of mileage out of his comments on building a moon colony by 2020. Whether you think that should get him a one-way ticket to the moon on the first flight or you believe his vision is an inspiration, he did accomplish one big thing.
Gingrich got the conversation started. What kind of space program do we want? What kind can we afford? Had Gingrich not said what he said, the space program might have been totally ignored, as it has been so often in the past.
But it came up at the CNN debate Thursday night in Jacksonville. And it came up again Friday afternoon.
A group of leaders in America’s space program wrote an open letter in support of Mitt Romney. They blasted the Obama administration: “We have watched with dismay as President Obama dismantled the structure that was guiding both the government and commercial space sectors, while providing no purpose or vision or mission.”
Then, they anointed Romney as the candidate best suited to get the program back on track, writing, “We support Mitt’s candidacy and believe that his approach to space policy will produce results instead of empty promises.”
Those who signed this letter are not lightweights. On the list are two former astronauts: Bob Crippen, who flew the first space shuttle, and Gene Cernan, who was the last man on the moon. Michael Griffin, a former NASA administrator, is also on the list.
Folks within NASA won’t, of course, say anything publicly about the candidates. It wouldn’t be prudent to criticize someone who might end up holding your purse strings. The way it was put to me by a NASA insider is that they are watching with “cautious curiosity.”
Folks at the space agency also say they can’t afford to hit the restart button again. “That’s a very real worry,” says John Matson, associate editor for Scientific American. “If every administration has a different vision and direction then nothing is gonna happen.”
That is pretty much exactly what’s happened in recent decades. For a while, both Bush presidents talked of getting humans back to the moon and on to Mars. Of course, that went away, as it was deemed way too costly. Then the shuttle would be replaced by the Ares rocket. You remember that one? We in the media called it affectionately “the lawn dart.” It would take astronauts to the space station and an Ares-on-steroids version could go to the moon. That, too, went away.
Now, there is a supposed flexible path that this administration is following that maybe sends astronauts to an asteroid and eventually Mars using a new heavy lift rocket yet to be designed or built. So, when you say NASA is “wandering in the desert of space,” as Cernan told me once, it’s not all on the agency. There’s plenty of blame to go around.
Matson says that one big criticism of the Obama space plan is “the flexible path doesn’t carry firm timelines. A lot of people worry we’re not gonna get anywhere.”
Now, I don’t think anyone is naïve enough to believe this space conversation will last after the candidates leave Florida. Maybe it will come up in Alabama and Texas, but not likely to the degree it has come up here, where thousands of jobs were lost when the shuttle program shut down.
Perhaps the most important thing in this entire space conversation has less to do with going to the moon or Mars and far more what you get out of it. Al Worden, who was command module pilot on Apollo 15, says it’s really about advancing technology. Worden says he thinks Gingrich gets it: “Who’s going to develop the future technology that’s needed if not through the space program? What kind of motivation do kids have without the space program?”
One of the quickest ways to become a second-rate nation lagging behind in technology, people like Worden and Cernan say, is to do away with space exploration.
The fact of the matter is, you can have all the big ideas you want if you’ve got the money. Right now, NASA is barely scraping by. Its $18 billion budget is about half of 1% of the federal budget. Apollo was about 4%. Matson says, “I’d be pretty shocked if he (Gingrich) even remotely put the kinds of money up that JFK did.”
But if he wants to go to the moon he might have to. It’s not likely commercial companies will pave the way. They need a reason for going, a return on the investment. How many years has it been since we landed on the moon? No one has been back since, at least not that we know of!
Anyway, they may be pandering for votes. But at least candidates are talking about space. That’s a start.
1 During fiscal year 2011, the U.S. government spent 3.7 trillion dollars but it only brought in 2.4 trillion dollars.
#2 When Ronald Reagan took office, the U.S. national debt was less than 1 trillion dollars. Today, the U.S. national debt is over 15.2 trillion dollars.
#3 During 2011, U.S. debt surpassed 100 percent of GDP for the first time ever
#5 The U.S. government spent over 454 billion dollars just on interest on the national debt during fiscal 2011.
#6 The U.S. government has total assets of 2.7 trillion dollars and has total liabilities of 17.5 trillion dollars. The liabilities do not even count 4.7 trillion dollars of intragovernmental debt that is currently outstanding.
#7 During the Obama administration, the U.S. government has accumulated more debt than it did from the time that George Washington took office to the time that Bill Clinton took office.
#8 It is being projected that the U.S. national debt will surpass 23 trillion dollars in 2015.
#9 According to the GAO, the U.S. government is facing 34 trillion dollars in unfunded liabilities for social insurance programs such as Social Security and Medicare. These are obligations that we have already committed ourselves to but that we do not have any money for.
#10 Others estimate that the unfunded liabilities of the U.S. government now total over 117 trillion dollars.
#11 According to the GAO, the ratio of debt held by the public to GDP is projected to reach 287 percent of GDP by 2086.
#12 Others are much less optimistic. A recently revised IMF policy paper entitled “An Analysis of U.S. Fiscal and Generational Imbalances: Who Will Pay and How?” projects that U.S. government debt will rise to about 400 percent of GDP by the year 2050.
#13 The United States government is responsible for more than a third of all the government debt in the entire world.
#14 If you divide up the national debt equally among all U.S. taxpayers, each taxpayer would owe approximately $134,685.
#15 Mandatory federal spending surpassed total federal revenue for the first time ever in fiscal 2011. That was not supposed to happen until 50 years from now.
#16 Between 2007 and 2010, U.S. GDP grew by only 4.26%, but the U.S. national debt soared by 61% during that same time period.

#17 During Barack Obama’s first two years in office, the U.S. government added more to the U.S. national debt than the first 100 U.S. Congresses combined.
#18 When you add up all spending by the federal government, state governments and local governments, it comes to 46.6% of GDP.
#19 Our nation is more addicted to government checks than ever before. In 1980, government transfer payments accounted for just 11.7% of all income. Today, government transfer payments account for 18.4% of all income.
#20 U.S. households are now actually receiving more money directly from the U.S. government than they are paying to the government in taxes.***********************
#21 A staggering 48.5% of all Americans live in a household that receives some form of government benefits. Back in 1983, that number was below 30 percent.***********************
#22 Back in 1965, only one out of every 50 Americans was on Medicaid. Today, one out of every 6 Americans is on Medicaid.****************************
#23 In 1950, each retiree’s Social Security benefit was paid for by 16 U.S. workers. According to new data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, there are now only 1.75 full-time private sector workers for each person that is receiving Social Security benefits in the United States.
#24 The U.S. government now says that the Medicare trust fund will run out five years faster than they were projecting just last year.*******************
#25 Right now, spending by the federal government accounts for about 24 percent of GDP. Back in 2001, it accounted for just 18 percent.
#26 If the U.S. government was forced to use GAAP accounting principles (like all publicly-traded corporations must), the U.S. government budget deficit would be somewhere in the neighborhood of $4 trillion to $5 trillion each and every year.
#31 If Bill Gates gave every penny of his fortune to the U.S. government, it would only cover the U.S. budget deficit for 15 days.
#33 If you add up all forms of debt in the United States (government, business and consumer), it comes to more than 56 trillion dollars. That is more than $683,000 per family. Unfortunately, the average amount of savings per family in the U.S. is only about $4,735.
#34 The U.S. national debt is now more than 5000 times larger than it was when the Federal Reserve was created back in 1913.
But do our leaders care about statistics such as these?
No.
In fact, Barack Obama says that we need to raise the debt limit by another 1.2 trillion dollars.